Permittable is now Permavia. Read about our new name

comparison

Permavia vs. Archistar

Both Permavia and Archistar apply AI to the built environment, but they solve different parts of the problem. Permavia is built around getting a building-permit submittal first-pass ready; Archistar is best known for site assessment, feasibility, and planning-rule compliance.

at a glance

Side-by-side comparison

Based on publicly available information as of 2026. Capabilities change quickly — verify current details with each vendor.

Dimension
permit readiness
Permavia
applicant-side
A
Archistar
site & planning
Primary focus

Pre-submittal permit readiness for U.S. building permits (applicants), plus tools for cities.

AI-driven site assessment, property feasibility, and planning/compliance pre-checks.

Core output

Permit Review Diagnostic with exact code citations and a readiness score (e.g. "87% ready").

Site/feasibility insights and automated planning-rule compliance checks.

Best for

Architects, engineers, and developers getting a submittal first-pass ready.

Property feasibility, site selection, and planning-led workflows.

Free entry point

Code Scout — free AI concierge for building & zoning questions.

Varies by product and region.

the Permavia edge

Where they overlap — and where they don't

Archistar has built its reputation on site feasibility and planning-rule analysis — answering “what can I build here?” Permavia starts later in the lifecycle, at the submittal: it reviews your plans against building, fire, and zoning codes and tells you what a reviewer will flag before you submit, with the exact code section cited for each issue and a readiness score for the package as a whole.

If your need is applicant-side permit readiness, that's the workflow Permavia is designed for.

decision guide

How to choose

1

Demand first-pass readiness

The goal isn't a slicker workflow — it's approval on the first submission. Judge every tool by whether it actually tells you you're ready to submit. Permavia is built around exactly that.

2

Require code-cited traceability

A flag you can't trace is a flag you can't act on. Permavia cites the exact code section for every issue — fast to fix, and defensible when a reviewer pushes back.

3

Check real local coverage

Codes and local amendments vary by jurisdiction. Permavia covers building, fire, and zoning — the rules that actually get projects bounced.

frequently asked

Permavia vs. Archistar: FAQ

What is the difference between Permavia and Archistar?

Both apply AI to building and planning compliance. Permavia focuses on the applicant-side, pre-submittal workflow for U.S. building permits — a Permit Review Diagnostic with exact code citations and a readiness score — and also serves cities. Archistar is known for AI-driven site assessment and planning/compliance pre-checks, with a strong footprint in property feasibility and council/planning rules.

Does Permavia do site feasibility like Archistar?

Permavia concentrates on getting a submittal permit-ready — checking plans against building, fire, and zoning codes before submission — rather than property/site feasibility analysis. If your priority is catching code issues and proving readiness before you submit, that's the workflow Permavia is built for.

Can I try Permavia for free?

Yes. Code Scout, Permavia's free AI concierge for building and zoning questions, is available at no cost.

Which should I choose?

Evaluate both against your jurisdictions and use case. For applicant-side U.S. permit readiness with code-cited findings, Permavia is purpose-built; for planning/feasibility-led workflows, weigh Archistar's strengths there.

see your readiness before you submit

Run your plans through the Permit Review Diagnostic

Get a clear, code-cited path to first-pass approval.